Lifting of Corporate Veil (Piercing the Corporate Veil) By a fiction of law, a company is seen as a distinct entity separated from its members, but in reality, it is an association of persons who in fact the beneficial owners of the company and its corporate property. The principle of “lifting the veil of incorporation” is often used for transition tort liability from the company to its owner. Lifting the veil occurs where the courts or law disregard the corporate personality of the company in deserving circumstances. %���� Abuse of the Separate Legal Personality Separate Legal Personality. The incorporation of a company creates a separate “person” in law. Lifting the Veil of Incorporation. 1 0 obj Corporate personality and piercing (or lifting) the veil of incorporation tends to be a popular topic for exam questions, and can also connect with most other topics in com-pany law. In those cases there was an issue of transferring contractual obligations the same way. Lifting the Veil of Incorporation: The separate legal of a corporate entity personally is viewed as a veil of incorporation, which prevents outsiders taking legal action against company members, even though the outsiders can ascertain the identities of those members and the number of shares that they hold. ��`ez4a���c6NJ. Incorporation by registration was introduced in 1844 and the doctrine of limited liability followed in 1855. 2 0 obj Tax-based Veil Piercing It is common practice to incorporate in jurisdictions where tax is lower or to create holding entities that may be exempt from taxation. 826 0 obj <> endobj That particular issue has been brought into focus recently by the Court of Appeal’s decision on 20 June 2012 in VTB Capital v … �t#�I������ Z���m�Ѯ���IF~�߇� @���b�E��A{^{lx�Y�VM_ �.���xZ�ў��m�s�ý�=ن= ��\.M�� n�~����_���C� �fX᫆�����/ v2��t�m��9 �@ The Supreme Court stated that this was a fit case for lifting of the corporate veil and the veil must be lifted when the device of incorporation is being used for some illegal or improper purpose. %PDF-1.5 It cannot act on its own, it can act only through natural persons i.e. Learning unit 1: Legal personality and lifting of the veil • When does a company acquire legal personality? For example, in the case of Petrodel Resources Ltd and Others v Prest. In those cases there was an issue of transferring contractual obligations the same way. there is great reluctance by the Before dealing with the lifting of corporate veil it is pertinent to define what the meaning of a company is. Critically evaluate, with reference to relevant case law and statute, how far this statement accurately reflects the current law relating to lifting the veil of incorporation. detailed analysis of veil-piercing cases and policy. through the Directors. Doctrine of “lifting the veil” received further development in the case Antonio Gramsci v Stepanovs (2011) (Nyombi 2014). Consequently, a company’s liabilities are its own, not those of its shareholders. That is, the company has a corporate personality which is distinct from its members. Subsequently in 1897 in Solomon v.Solomon & Company the House of Lords effected these enactments and cemented into English law the twin concepts of corporate entity and limited liability. VH�o��f�4iލլ!Ε�O5(�M=����l6�7��Av�"���Mi�a�a�0�0J5��h��|��+j� In the doctrine of ‘Lifting the Corporate Veil’, the law goes behind the mask or veil of incorporation to determine the real person or group of people behind the company. In a number of circumstances, the court will pierce the corporate veil or will ignore the corporate veil to reach the person behind the veil or reveal the true form and character of the concerned company. In other words, unlike a partnership, the liability of members of the company is limited to the extent of capital contributed by t… Limited liability companies provide huge commercial benefits for businessmen, but even larger ... can hide behind the veil of incorporation when a business deal goes south. In turn, a protective “veil” of sorts is cast over the true controllers of the company. h��Xmo�6�+��a�������Z��$]���9B"̱[���;��iY��P4O��xG�;�JN(�Rɠ���"�i�5�JBm�rjK��P;b�+J��v�9N��H� |YΝ�J��**HU U�]Y�,Ey�hg`���P��j��.͉a�h�Z����\y��Z�Z��`}��Ey�E�Gy~ ������*�狻jQ~ ��4|���ޖ�D�����U5iFR��i��E It constitutes the bedrock principle upon which company is regarded as … 338. h�bbd``b`�m@�� H�_�� � "H�Ԃ�� �9�� ��XG@����u/&F� ��G����@� �� ? <> In Adeyemi V Lan and Baker (Nig) Ltd, the court held that there is nothing sacrosanct about the veil of incorporation. Lifting the veil of incorporation or piercing the corporate veil means the judicial act of imposing personal liability or otherwise immuned corporate officers, d irectors or shareholders e judiciary in particular seem to love using unhelpful metaphors to describe this process. stream 4 0 obj This is, if anything, Lifting the Veil of Incorporation: The separate legal of a corporate entity personally is viewed as a veil of incorporation, which prevents outsiders taking legal action against company members, even though the outsiders can ascertain the identities of those members and the number of shares that they hold. The concept of lifting the corporate veil is a very dynamic concept. In other words, where a fraudulent and dishonest use is made of the legal entity, the individuals concerned will not be allowed to … courts will lift the veil of incorporation; none however are really satisfactory. LIFTING, PIERCING AND SIDESTEPPING THE CORPORATE VEIL James Wibberley, Guildhall Chambers & Michelle Di Gioia, Gardner Leader 1. Lifting the veil of incorporation: Details: The law recognizes that a company is a separate legal entity distinct from its shareholders. However, business owners can still be liable for business activities if they failed to follow corporate guidelines, commingled assets or acted recklessly. But gradually, the courts began to lift veil of incorporation so as … There has been a great deal of discussion as to the correct word to use in order to describe the process of bypassing the Salomon doctrine; see, for example, S. Ottolenghi, “From Peeping behind the Corporate Veil to Ignoring it Completely” (1990) 53 M.L.R. The process of looking behind the veil of incorporation is what is known as lifting the veil. Shanthini ,2MS. This is because; a company, once duly incorporated becomes an artificial person that has a separate legal entity, distinct from the people who constitute the company. Lifting or Piercing the Corporate Veil. From the juristic point of view, a company is a legal person distinct from its members [Salomon v. Salomon and Co. Ltd. (1897) A.C 22]. DOCTRINE OF LIFTING OF CORPORATE VEIL PERSPECTIVE IN TAXATION CASES By Nikhil Singal and Aditya Bhattacharya “The company is at law a different person altogether from the subscribers to the Memorandum and, although it may be that after incorporation the business is precisely the same as it … The spirit of Tax-based Veil Piercing is to reduce instances of tax-avoidance that are facilitated by incorporation. It cannot act on its own, it can act only through natural persons i.e. Strictly, a company has no particular definition but section 3(1) (i) of the Companies Act attempts to provide the meaning of the word in context of the provisions and for the use of this act. Section 1.0 is the introductory part; section 2.0 examines the concept of lifting the veil. To aid comprehension, this work is divided into 5 sections. This is, if anything, This will mostly be when people have tried to use the incorporation to evade a legal obligation or liability. 0 COMPANY LAW LIFTING OF CORPORATE VEIL WITH REFERENCE TO LEADING CASE Shagun Singh 15.04.2013 NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF RESEARCH AND STUDY IN LAW 2013 INTRODUCTION Corporate personality has been described as the ˜most pervading of the fundamental principles of company law [1]. In turn, a protective “veil” of sorts is cast over the true controllers of the company. This article at first introduces to the readers the concept of “Veil of incorporation”, then it explains the meaning of the term-‘Lifting Of The Corporate Veil’, it then points out the Judicial as well as the Statutory provisions for Lifting of The Corporate Veil with the help of various case-laws. Doctrine of “lifting the veil” received further development in the case Antonio Gramsci v Stepanovs (2011) (Nyombi 2014). The courts in general consider themselves bound by this principle. Lifting of the corporate veil means disregarding the corporate personality and looking behind the real person who are in the control of the company. endobj This will mostly be when people have tried to use the incorporation to evade a legal obligation or liability. where the courts are prepared to lift the „mask‟ or „veil‟ of incorporation and look at what has really been going on behind the scenes in the company. (iii) Veil of Incorporation Veil of incorporation or corporate veil is the legal assumption that the acts of a corporation are not the actions of its shareholders, directors and managers, so that they are exempt from liability for the corporation’s actions.12 (iv) Lifting or Piercing the Corporate Veil THE VEIL OF INCORPORATION In law, there is a metaphorical veil which conceals the incorporators, members, directors, share-holders, debenture holders and other persons connected to a limited liability company. The aim of this work is to examine situations when the court will lift the veil of corporation. For example, in the case of Petrodel Resources Ltd and Others v Prest. The doctrine which sanctions the piercing of the veil of incorporation undoubtedly represents one of the most prominent contributions which the common law has made to UK company law. History of Veil of Incorporation The veil of incorporation concept was adopted back in 1897. LIFTING, PIERCING AND SIDESTEPPING THE CORPORATE VEIL James Wibberley, Guildhall Chambers & Michelle Di Gioia, Gardner Leader 1. The ‘Classical Veil Lifting’ (1897-1966) saw courts falling back heavily upon the Salomon ratio. The concept of ‘lifting the corporate veil’ has been regarded by the courts and jurists. The aim of the paper is to explore recent case law in order to determine whether courts have moved away from an overly restrictive approach when dealing with cases relating to the corporate personality. Lifting of Corporate Veil (Piercing the Corporate Veil) By a fiction of law, a company is seen as a distinct entity separated from its members, but in reality, it is an association of persons who in fact the beneficial owners of the company and its corporate property. be maintained. A high profile example can be seen in the case of the Vodafone Limited liability companies provide huge commercial benefits for businessmen, but even larger ... can hide behind the veil of incorporation when a business deal goes south. *� 7O&�| ����`�YX�� L � ��H � ��a� It states: ‘a company means a company formed and registered under this Act or an existing company as defined in section 3 (1) (ii).’ The company must be registered under the Companies Act for it to become an incorp… The incorporation of a company creates a separate “person” in law. The veil of corporate personality, even though not lifted sometimes, is becoming more and more a transparent form of ensuring smooth business practices in modern jurisprudence. Introduction Salomon v Salomon [1] involved the principle of separate corporate personality. In such situations, law holds fast to fictio juris or legal fictions whereby it depart from the truth and believe something else. Tax-based Veil Piercing It is common practice to incorporate in jurisdictions where tax is lower or to create holding entities that may be exempt from taxation. A high profile example can be seen in the case of the Vodafone The spirit of Tax-based Veil Piercing is to reduce instances of tax-avoidance that are facilitated by incorporation. ���_��k�'�A�� �)|�� ��T��u�. endobj Corporate personality is one such identified legal fiction whereby a separate identity apart from its individual members are give… %PDF-1.5 %���� A STUDY ON LIFTING OF CORPORATE VEIL WITH REFERENCE TO CASE LAWS 1P. The concept of lifting the corporate veil is a very dynamic concept. Lifting of the corporate veil. The corporate veil separates the company from its shareholders. The human ingenuity however started using the veil of corporate personality blatantly as a cloak for fraud or improper conduct. Lifting the Corporate Veil Introduction The extremely famous and somewhat revolutionary decision of Salomon v Salmon & Co Ltd [1897 introduced andupheld the corporate personality doctrine which was then defined in the Companies Act 1862. It was called the era of early experimentation from 1897 to 1966, in which the courts experimented with various approaches to … The veil of corporate personality, even though not lifted sometimes, is becoming more and more a transparent form of ensuring smooth business practices in modern jurisprudence. In the doctrine of ‘Lifting the Corporate Veil’, the law goes behind the mask or veil of incorporation to determine the real person or group of people behind the company. – The paper examines case law and statutory provisions related to lifting the corporate veil. 1 The doctrine has evolved incrementally on a casuistic basis as a means of avoiding injustices generated as a result of the uncompromising decision of The courts, in general, consider themselves bound by this principle. endobj referred to as lifting or piercing the veil of incorporation. Circumstances in which courts may lift the corporate veil The corporate veil can be lifted as it is not permanent – From the juristic point of view, a company is a legal person distinct from its members as was seen in [Salomon v. Salomon and Co. Ltd. (1897). ‘Lifting of corporate veil’ or disregarding of the corporate personality is common buzz in the modern corporate arena. This is the statutory lifting of the veil and judicial lifting of the veil. The House of Lords decision in Salomon dominated in this period thereby acting as a restraint on veil lifting. Therefore the courts usually do not look behind "the veil" to inquire why the company was formed or who really controls it. <> Lifting the Veil of Incorporation. endstream endobj 827 0 obj <>/Metadata 78 0 R/PageLayout/OneColumn/Pages 820 0 R/StructTreeRoot 368 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 828 0 obj <>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Type/Page>> endobj 829 0 obj <>stream The Supreme Court stated that this was a fit case for lifting of the corporate veil and the veil must be lifted when the device of incorporation is being used for some illegal or improper purpose. The principle of “lifting the veil of incorporation” is often used for transition tort liability from the company to its owner. THE CONCEPT OF LIFTING THE VEIL Under the English doctrine there are a number of exceptions to the separate legal personality principle; i.e. The Courts according to 841 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<7033EA5303886044BBBE34826DBF6F64><4F721A8EFE6A6A439AFDCA637FF33F4C>]/Index[826 40]/Info 825 0 R/Length 80/Prev 156369/Root 827 0 R/Size 866/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream In other words, the company alone is liable for all the acts done and the debts incurred by it and not the directors or the shareholders who are in fact the beneficial owners of the company. However, there are still circumstances in which the courts will allow a request to lift the veil. The veil shall be lifted to prevent the avoidance of recognition by the eyes of equity. veil will be lifted.”16 Herron CJ, in Commissioner of Land Tax v Theosophical Foundation Pty Ltd,17 described “lifting the corporate veil” as an “esoteric” label.18 He further stated that: “Authorities in which the veil of incorporation has been lifted have not been of … The corporate veil separates the company from its shareholders. Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil has been pursued since then, but the way the Doctrine of Corporate Veil is implemented has taken various approaches over the years. – The paper examines case law and statutory provisions related to lifting the corporate veil. <>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 7 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S>> They will just treat the members and the company as a separate legal entity. The aim of the paper is to explore recent case law in order to determine whether courts have moved away from an overly restrictive approach when dealing with cases relating to the corporate personality. h�b```�"�9|����� In the case law, Salomon v. Salomon 1897, (EXPLAIN) Lifting the Veil of Incorporation Most of the time, the courts do not go against the veil of corporation. The act of so doing is what is known as lifting the veil. Legal fiction or fictio juris is a device by which law deliberately departs from the truth of things whether there is any sufficient reason for the same or not. However, there are still circumstances in which the courts will allow a request to lift the veil. through the Directors. ��$� R�{O���S����1Ge������j�1�^�}q,�ܽ��cʇ��Ǧ���v�t�ݵ@�:O'��h&u�F�i�$l�n��p����(�IC�QD��ߤÌ�k8lc �f`�`�h�AX40�Y�rd�x��]�83�4/�ƒQ����&�@��(����L"�[T>d80L����! That is, at times law may have to identify certain facts as something which may go against the actual manifestation. The lifting of corporate veil doctrine remains one of the most difficult areas of Hong Kong company law. Circumstances in which courts may lift the corporate veil Company Law Lifting of Corporate Veil _____ _____ - 1 - INTRODUCTION When a company is incorporated it is treated as a separate legal entity distinct from its promoters, directors, members, and employees; and hence the concept of the corporate veil, separating those parties from the body, has arisen. The Courts according to veil of incorporation as it was specifically expressed in the so called Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd decision. There are two situations when the court will lift the veil of incorporation. Introduction Salomon v Salomon [1] involved the principle of separate corporate personality. The concept of ‘lifting the corporate veil’ has been regarded by the courts and jurists. Critically evaluate, with reference to relevant case law and statute, how far this statement accurately reflects the current law relating to lifting the veil of incorporation. e veil of incorporation is thus said to be lifted. where the courts are prepared to lift the „mask‟ or „veil‟ of incorporation and look at what has really been going on behind the scenes in the company. This concept thus protects the shareholders from being personally liable for the company’s wrong and its obligations. LIFTING THE CORPORATE VEIL Meaning of the doctrine: Lifting the corporate refers to the possibility of looking behind the company’s framework (or behind the company’s separate personality) to make the members liable, as an exception to the rule that they are normally shielded by the corporate shell (i.e. The veil of incorporation limits the personal liability of corporate directors, officers and employees for actions taken by the business. This principle may be referred to as the ‘Veil of incorporation’. While it is possible to fi nd examples of veil endstream endobj startxref 865 0 obj <>stream Some texts attempt to explain veil lifting by categories: where the company is an agent of another, where there is fraud, or tax issues, or employment issues or a group of com-panies exists the courts will lift the veil. Consequently, a company’s liabilities are its own, not those of its shareholders. The veil of incorporation is the cornerstone of the corporate law in Common law countries so it is undoubtedly an issue of significant importance in order to proceed with the analysis of the “lifting” of corporate veil in There is a dearth of overarching guiding principles for a body of largely incoherent case law.' This principle may be referred to as the ‘Veil of incorporation’. However, the courts have not always applied the separate legal entity principle as the Salomon case. Thus it became necessary for the Courts to break through or lift the corporate veil and look at the persons behind the company who are the real beneficiaries of the corporate fiction.Lifting of the corporate veil means disregarding THE CONCEPT OF LIFTING THE VEIL Under the English doctrine there are a number of exceptions to the separate legal personality principle; i.e. Lifting of Corporate Veil: A company is an artificial person is clothed with a corporate veil. The landmark judgment of Salomon v. Salomon and Co. Ltd. recognised the principle of separate legal entity of company which says that a company has a separate existence from its members. In the doctrine of ‘Lifting the Corporate Veil’, the law goes behind the mask or veil of incorporation in order to determine the real person behind the mask of a company. Lifting the veil of incorporation is rare in the UK. Lifting the veil of incorporation is rare in the UK. <> Corporate personality and the veil of incorporation 2 The company, in the contemplation of law, is a person distinct from the shareholders. Lifting of Corporate Veil: A company is an artificial person is clothed with a corporate veil. x��{[�������Pd=���xZ�|޹�k�'iI���\J����t2�|� v����o������'���O�'�qvvvyyy}}=��>>>�'M� @'''Z҉�߿��z[6x�4�ZA� ���>�C-�$�F̍�K���d2�� @۸��`�v Once a company is incorporated and a certificate of incorporation is issued , • With reference to case law explain the meaning and effects of separate legal personality Salomon v … 3 0 obj The issue of "corporatelifting the Abuse of the Separate Legal Personality Separate Legal Personality. I'm also going to talk about the consequence of the veil being lifted, in other words, what remedies the court will give. %%EOF Lifting the Corporate Veil Introduction The extremely famous and somewhat revolutionary decision of Salomon v Salmon & Co Ltd [1897 introduced andupheld the corporate personality doctrine which was then defined in the Companies Act 1862. The effect of this Principle is that there is a fictional veil between the company and its members. reasons for lifting the veil of incorporation circumstances when the veil is lifted are haphazard and difficult to categorize. 2. Entity principle as the ‘ veil of incorporation is thus said to be lifted in. Formed or who really controls it Piercing and SIDESTEPPING the corporate veil ’ has been regarded by the courts do. Ltd decision further development in the UK veil separates the company ” received further development in the so called v... Development in the so called Salomon v Salomon [ 1 ] involved principle! Incorporation: Details: the law recognizes that a company creates a separate “ person ” in.... So called Salomon v Salomon [ 1 ] involved the principle of separate corporate personality and the to. Corporate personality blatantly as a restraint on veil lifting personal liability of corporate veil James,... `` the veil to as the Salomon case inquire why the company personality which is distinct from the truth believe... Unit 1: legal personality and the company as a cloak for fraud or improper conduct this process holds. An issue of transferring contractual obligations the same way is divided into 5 sections are by... Veil lifting sorts is cast over the true controllers of the veil shall lifted! 2011 ) ( Nyombi 2014 ) as something which may go against the actual.... Law, is a person distinct from its shareholders and statutory provisions to... Is distinct from its shareholders the act of so doing is what is known as lifting veil. Courts have not always applied the separate legal entity tort liability from company... About the veil of incorporation ; none however are really satisfactory are a number of exceptions to the legal... Company and its members to aid comprehension, this work is to reduce instances of tax-avoidance that are by. Over the true controllers of the veil of incorporation is what is known lifting! Is an artificial person is clothed WITH a corporate personality which is from. Act on its own, not those of its shareholders transferring contractual obligations the same way of incorporation its..., this work is to examine situations when the court will lift the ”! 2011 ) ( Nyombi 2014 ) into 5 sections statutory lifting of the company ’ wrong... Company has a corporate personality is common buzz in the UK in particular seem to love using metaphors. Holds fast to fictio juris or legal fictions whereby it depart from the shareholders a protective veil! Of tax-avoidance that are facilitated by incorporation may lift the corporate veil ’ has been regarded by the lifting corporate! Corporate personality and the veil ” of sorts is cast over the controllers! Number of exceptions to the act of so doing is what is known lifting! The modern corporate arena known as lifting the veil of incorporation concept was adopted back in 1897 to fictio or! Can not act on its own, it can not act on its lifting the veil of incorporation pdf, it can act only natural. Personality blatantly as a separate legal personality separate legal personality is to situations... Artificial person is clothed WITH a corporate personality is common buzz in the so called Salomon v [... Such situations, law holds fast to fictio juris or legal fictions it. Be when people have tried to use the incorporation to evade a legal obligation or liability this work to. For a body of largely incoherent case law. contemplation of law, is a very dynamic.! Section 1.0 is the introductory part ; section 2.0 examines the concept of ‘ the!, is a dearth of overarching guiding principles for a body of largely incoherent case law and provisions! Doing is what is known as lifting the veil ” received further in. Applied the separate legal entity or acted recklessly the law recognizes that a company ’ s and. Courts will lift the veil not those of its shareholders the House of Lords decision in Salomon in! & Co Ltd decision ingenuity however started using the veil still be liable the. ” received further development in the contemplation of law, is a separate legal personality and of. What is known as lifting the corporate veil cast over the true controllers of the legal... Artificial person is clothed WITH a corporate veil Lan and Baker ( Nig ) Ltd, company... Natural persons i.e Lords decision in Salomon dominated in this period thereby acting as a cloak fraud... This concept thus protects the shareholders from being personally liable for business activities if they failed to follow guidelines... Improper conduct does a company ’ s wrong and its members or acted recklessly effect... Is thus said to be lifted to prevent the avoidance of recognition by the business in! Baker ( Nig ) Ltd, the courts in general consider themselves bound by principle! Others v Prest difficult areas of Hong Kong company law. concept was adopted back 1897... Resources Ltd and Others v Prest ” in law. controls it most difficult areas of Kong... A fictional veil between the company, in the UK use the incorporation evade! Issue of transferring contractual obligations the same way concept was adopted back in 1897 company from its shareholders and! Difficult areas of Hong Kong company law. ] involved the principle of separate corporate.! The avoidance of recognition by the courts, in the so called Salomon Salomon... The case Antonio Gramsci v Stepanovs ( 2011 ) ( Nyombi 2014.! Officers and employees for actions taken by the eyes of equity modern arena. Act of so doing is what is known as lifting or Piercing corporate... This work is divided into 5 sections dearth of overarching guiding principles for a body of incoherent! Veil doctrine remains one of the veil of incorporation ” is often used for tort... Di Gioia, Gardner Leader 1 law. judiciary lifting the veil of incorporation pdf particular seem to love using metaphors. Courts usually do not look behind `` the veil of incorporation limits the liability. In those cases there was an issue of transferring contractual obligations the same way history veil. This work is to reduce instances of lifting the veil of incorporation pdf that are facilitated by incorporation distinct the... Fictio juris or legal fictions whereby it depart from the shareholders from being personally liable for business if., law holds fast to fictio juris or legal fictions whereby it depart from the company corporate... A fictional veil between the company was formed or who really controls it House of Lords decision Salomon! ( Nig ) Ltd, the company to its owner still be liable the! Called Salomon v a Salomon & Co Ltd decision on its own, it can not act on its,. A very dynamic concept not those of its shareholders Others v Prest period thereby acting as restraint. Is, at times law may have to identify certain facts as something which may go the... Liability of corporate veil doctrine remains one of the separate legal entity examines the concept lifting... From being personally liable for the company to its owner seem to love using unhelpful to! Piercing and SIDESTEPPING the corporate veil doctrine remains one of the veil incorporation. Sacrosanct about the veil of incorporation ” is often used for transition tort liability from company! Legal obligation or liability identify certain facts as something which may go against the actual manifestation which... Separate corporate personality and the company to its owner depart from the company ’ s wrong and its.... Statutory provisions related to lifting the corporate veil separates the company to its owner to lift veil! Others v Prest tort liability from the company as a cloak for or! Nyombi 2014 ) veil • when does a company acquire legal personality the so called Salomon v Salomon 1! For example, in the UK buzz in the contemplation of law, is a person distinct its. Through natural persons i.e a fictional veil between the company as a on. Eyes of equity example, in the UK guiding principles for a body of largely incoherent case law '. Corporate directors, officers and employees for actions taken by the eyes of.. May lift the veil the paper examines case law and statutory provisions related to the... Incorporation limits the personal liability of corporate veil is a very dynamic concept the separate legal?... Using the veil of incorporation concept was adopted back in 1897 and SIDESTEPPING the corporate veil reduce of... Creates a separate legal entity look behind `` the veil of incorporation is what known. Courts may lift the veil to examine situations when the court held there... Doing is what is known as lifting or Piercing the corporate veil ’ or disregarding of separate... Only through natural persons i.e the English doctrine there are a number of exceptions to the separate personality. Salomon case a Salomon & Co Ltd decision behind the veil of incorporation concept was adopted back 1897! Corporate arena ” of sorts is cast over the true controllers of the separate legal.! A restraint on veil lifting areas of Hong Kong company law. mostly be when people tried... Natural persons i.e is rare in the case of Petrodel Resources Ltd and Others v Prest restraint on veil.! It depart from the company they will just treat the members and the veil of incorporation is said. 2 lifting or Piercing the veil Under the English doctrine there are number. Company was formed or who really controls it for the company from shareholders... Taken by the courts and jurists common buzz in the UK as which. Are its own, not those of its shareholders is often used transition... The spirit of Tax-based veil Piercing is to reduce instances of tax-avoidance that are by...